Used to be good, but now it’s just an inconsistent MAGA rationalization aka “sanewashing” podcast. While context is important for everything, the podcast essentially takes a controversial topic, rationalizes it for Trump, adds “context” and uses literal TikTok videos to juxtapose what’s being said as the “liberal slant” and then tries to calm the issue down by pointing out what some nut on social media is saying. Actual unbiased news would use what democratic and liberal politicians and reputable sources are saying and add what MAGA/republicans and reputable sources are saying and leave it at that. When the comparison is always some wack job on TikTok vs the Trump administration, you know full well she’s got an agenda and isn’t actually researching or listening to legitimate opposing viewpoints. It used to be 4 days with some misses, then it’s 2 days with still some misses. She’s stated that she has an intern but can’t trust anyone to fill in for her during absences so every time that happens, I have to search for another news podcast (which fortunately led me to the much more even keeled WSJ pod). Also, far too much time is spent explaining what is going to be explained before explaining it. Just say the thing, man, my word! Finally, the mispronouncing of numerous names and words is crazy. eT cetera not eck cetera eSpecially not expecially Gee-len Maxwell not jizz-lane EN-vidia not NUH-vidia Crime-ee-uh not crimeee-ah Lav-rov not lay-ver-ove Sayer-gay not sar-jay

I recommend and share this podcast on my social media because it is the ONLY place to get FACTS without bias. She researches, educates and you can form your own opinion. So glad I found this podcast!!!!!!

I am a relatively new listener, but I am a fan so far. I looked through the ratings and was amused by some of the unfavorable reviews. They reveal more about the reviewers than the podcast. Some of us are unable to appreciate anything but an echo chamber. As human beings it is nearly impossible to be unbiased. Although from my listening so far, it sounds like you’re doing a commendable job. Please don’t, as some reviews suggest, add a cohost to give point counterpoint. That would make you just like all the other Talking Heads. Keep up the good work.

All the stars, for sure! Jordan is awesome. I have no idea how she finds the information in a location that isn’t completely slanted one way or the other! She’s my only source of news. When she starts with something like “let’s talk about this latest thing in the news…” I’m thinking “I’m going to learn what’s going on in the world now.” Seriously, I consume no other news! My hubby or daughter might say something once in a while, but it’s rare. Thank you, Jordan. I’d be lost without you. Like I was before I found you. I don’t know where you find the time, but please keep up the excellent work!

If you're tired of the endless noise & partisan spin in today's media, Jordan's 'UNBIASED Politics' is an absolute game-changer. Her commitment to delivering the facts without a filter is incredibly refreshing & truly vital. I've personally relied on this podcast to cut through the chaos & genuinely help me understand what's happening, especially during intense times like the last election. Jordan doesn't tell you what to think; she gives you the tools to think for yourself, which is so empowering. This isn't 'news for clicks' – it's 'news for clarity,' & it's essential listening for anyone who wants to be truly informed. Huge fan & so grateful for this invaluable resource!

I found this useful and informative for a while but it just seemed to be getting less and less unbiased. This is probably petty but it seemed like the host didn’t bother learning how key names and topics are pronounced. “Jizz-lane” Maxwell was what pushed me to unsubscribe.

Finally somewhere to get more informed about what’s happening in our country without bias. I love this podcast. Jordan does a good job not just going over the current political headlines but diving deeper so you can understand what is happening and form your own educated opinion. Can’t wait to watch Jordan’s career continue to grow!

Jordan is an awesome place to get your news. You really can’t tell which side of the aisle she sits on. She is a disciplined content provider, who only gives the facts that she has access to and if she has to speculate she makes that known. I enjoy listening to her regularly. I really enjoyed her three parts series on the branches of the government. I highly recommend Adding her to your subscriptions for podcasting.

Jordan truly delivers what so many news outlets claim to but rarely achieve: unbiased, in-depth legal analysis. She doesn’t regurgitate emotionally charged headlines or spin narratives to fit a particular agenda. Instead, she breaks down complex legal issues with clarity and fairness, giving listeners the tools to form their own opinions. What’s especially frustrating is seeing one-star reviews accuse this podcast of “leaning right” simply because it doesn’t lean left. That’s very telling. If a neutral, fact-based analysis feels too conservative to you, maybe it’s not the podcast that needs rebalancing—maybe it’s your perspective. The middle isn’t meant to make you feel comfortable; it’s meant to challenge assumptions on both sides. Let’s be clear: explaining or analyzing a political figure or administration is not the same as endorsing them. That’s literally the point of being unbiased. If you’re looking for a podcast that exists solely to critique your political opponents or validate your worldview, this isn’t it. Jordan isn’t here to confirm your biases—she’s here to challenge them with facts. In an era where outrage has become a substitute for understanding, this podcast is a breath of fresh air. It encourages independent thought, not tribal loyalty. Highly recommend for anyone who values clarity over noise and wants to think for themselves.

In a recent episode, her response to the “Rumor Has It” segment about the "Big Beautiful Bill" was, at best, irresponsible and, at worst, deliberately confusing. Dismissing a legitimate concern about the bill simply because she couldn’t find specific wording in the text was not only unhelpful but also nonsensical. The analysis lacked any meaningful insight, and every response conveniently aligned with the administration’s stance. When she included a segment on the latest State of the Union address, casually saying, “this is probably what he meant,” in response to the President’s outlandish comments, I saw clear red flags. But it was when she used a simple CTRL-F search through the bill as her sole method of interpretation that I felt the podcast could no longer claim to be “unbiased.” This is a shame. When Unbiased News first launched, it seemed like she was genuinely aiming for fairness. But now, all that credibility is gone. The term "Unbiased Politics" is, frankly, an oxymoron at this point.

You may want to check the accuracy of a statement you made about the difference between criminal and civil actions. If I understood you correctly you said that speeding was not a criminal act but a civil act. In Georgia, if you are cited for speeding, you have broken a law and therefore it’s a criminal act. It’s prosecuted by the county prosecutor and must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt just like any other crime. I love your show and listen to every one! You do a great job of reporting the facts without opinion. Keep up the good work!

It’s hard to find a news source that makes such a strong effort to remove any bias or loaded commentary. I appreciate this podcast/youtube channel so much.

Informative, to the point and non-intimidating. Highly recommend.

Sanewashing this administration is crazy work. Reporting the facts in an unbiased manner is one thing, presenting it as normal is dangerous rhetoric.

I don’t always have the time or emotional capacity with everything going on the last 6 months. I want to stay informed without spiraling into information overload. Jordan’s Unbiased Podcast is exactly what I need. It’s clear, quick, and cuts through the noise. In just 5 minutes, I feel updated, balanced, and more in control. I trust Jordan’s take because she does the digging for both sides so I don’t have to. It’s efficient, honest, and exactly what news should be. What’s not to love? Thank you, Jordan!

I’m aware of my personal stance on various topics. Listening to the unbiased politics gives me the insight of what the other side focuses on. Somehow, it’s comforting to know that the other side is calm (or pretending they are calm).

Selective news stories focused on Trump and using a light version of his rhetoric. Trump focused, Trump normalizing, very biased and sneaky. I appreciate her long form detail but she is either pandering to her audience or genuinely Right biased.

You can tell by her language she is a TRUMPER 😂😂😂🤔

It’s so nice to have a bite sized chunk of news with the option to go back to the full episode for full details if desired. Also, in general, this podcast really does feel unbiased which is a rarity in today’s world and I really appreciate how she takes the time to dig through all the rumors and give us just the facts.

Jordan does a fantastic job just delivering the FACTS of the news. She breaks things down, explains complicated issues, she confirms or debunks rumors & how they get started. She is one of the only news people I truly can’t tell who she actually voted for as she isn’t slanted one way or the other. I appreciate her views & delivery. Thanks Jordan!

The facts that you choose to leave out and the words that you choose show clear bias. I used to listen all the time but as the bias has become more clear it’s difficult to get through even these shortened episodes. You say the people who listen to your podcast think you are unbiased and it’s those who don’t who give you bad reviews (I guess on TikTok and IG) but reading these recent reviews shows I’m not alone.

I love that you give the facts and nothing else. With so much misinformation and biased reporting in the news how do we, the people, know what is fact and what is false. Thank you!! Sometimes I do get lost with the news and don’t understand it so i appreciate you for speaking so well. I love the quick news and the longs one but the quick ones best. Again appreciate you . Saw you at press conference today and you brought amazing questions. It’s cool that you were there.

Completely unbiased reporting wether you like what you hear or not. If you just want to hear “your side” of things then this isn’t for you. You need to have an open mind and not just be filled with so much hatred for one side or the other that you refuse to hear actual facts. Personally I love it. Gives me facts plain and simple, then I can form my own opinions based on those facts not feelings.

I love the full podcast, but let’s be real—I can't always carve out the time to listen to the entire episodes. The under 5-minute option is a total game-changer! It keeps me in the loop without missing a beat. Thank you!

I listened to the full 40 min episode and then the 5 min recap. It helped me synthesize everything that I listened to before. Maybe an application of the 5 min clips that you didn’t anticipate! I came here from tik tok btw. Thank you for doing this work! I’m sick of my head spinning from biased news headlines everyday.

I think the 5 minute episode is a great idea.

While I enjoy Jordan’s longer podcasts, this is a great way to get up to speed - or at least not fall behind - on a busy day! Would love you to keep these up, Jordan!

Used to really love her analysis. Then several instances of reporting on this administration and she would quote their communications knowing validity was questionable at best. I appreciated her effort to dive deep into topics and provide background. Then she covered the tariffs… that line about not knowing greek letters. Didn’t jive with how she covers topics. I get remaining unbiased, but that doesn’t mean abandoning truth. Especially with a law background when covering the current state of political and legal environment.

Your podcast eases my anxiety for sure! Thank you so much for doing all the research and explaining the issues in terms that we can understand and also relate to previous administrations. My one comment would be that currently, the headlines that freak me out most are the ones where Trump signs an executive order targeting funds for programs at the Smithsonian because it doesn’t align with their ideology. And assigning Vance to remove improper ideology from the Smithsonian institution, including its museums, education and research centers and the national zoo. It seems like nobody is talking about this stuff. Or how about purging 26000 images of war heroes and military firsts from the defense departments database. These are the moves that are the most disturbing because it doesn’t have anything to do with the economy or global politics or normal administration goals. I would love it if you would expound on headlines like these.

Awesome podcast. Jordan’s reporting from a legal perspective talks me off of the ledge with my frustration at getting to the impact of these seemingly chaotic and polarizing decisions and times. I may or may not agree with the current administration’s method but I can now discern the madness with just the facts please. Thanks Jordan!

I appreciate the intention and effort but I definitely don’t feel that this podcast is unbiased. In fact, I leave feeling like things are normalized that shouldn’t be. Sometimes there aren’t two equally valid sides to an argument. One is a perceived fact and just plain not accurate and the other is the truth.

I appreciate what she’s trying to do but the TikTok style delivery drives me nuts. Maybe consider a co-host to have a more conversational style of podcast - or just vary your tone a bit. I realize many people don’t want to be bothered with facts these days, but presenting blatant lies as “one side” has also made me unfollow. I know that’s tricky in this age of yelling lies until the followers believe or being accused of MSM sheep - but there are objective facts that could be presented as such. I will say the reporting on IDEA and 504 plans was done very well. Some of Trump’s EO reporting - not so much. I’ll pop in occasionally but there are better news podcasts. (The MSM is there because they’ve honed a craft, even though they have their significant problems too.)

She chooses to report certain stories that have a political lean, so even if the presentation of it is all “facts” it paints a very biased picture of what is happening in the country and the world. She ends some segments with “good news” which is a biased description in and of itself even if most can agree it’s good news. I find openly political leaning independent news sources much more transparent! This will NOT give a well rounded view of news.

Simply calling your podcast unbiased doesn’t make it so. This is an insult to people’s intelligence.

Not sure you should use the term unbiased if you’re going to fact check the president of his address of Congress but you don’t fact check the Democrat response. Seems like you do you have a bais.

I’ve listened to her for a long time. She claims to be unbiased and she does a much better job than MSM, but it’s not completely unbiased. There are times she’s stating facts, but she’s leaving out information or she presents a certain side of the narrative. I still listen from time to time but take it with a grain of salt. No such thing as unbiased. We all have our own bias to some degree.

More people need to learn the difference between fact and opinion. Jordan does a great job sticking to facts or what is being reported. She also does a great job explaining complicated legal issues. I really appreciate her show and am going back and listening to her older episodes. They definitely help me understand these controversial events better. I want to know if she leans conservative or liberal personally… but I can’t tell! Which is definitely the point…

I used to enjoy this podcast because it seemed to just give the facts. But, since Trump took office there have been occasions in which Trump’s lies have been restated as facts. Quick research can show that the info is false, so restating it as facts without a fact check is highly misleading. It’s very disappointing because I really used to enjoy the podcast. Sadly this is why podcasts shouldn’t be a source of news.

Claiming to be unbiased but consistently only telling one sided versions of each story or more dangerous than any biased news platform. I am a long time listener and I have slowly heard Jordan become everything she claims to not be.

Not always thoroughly researched (see 504 plan coverage), definitely biased (all Elon/trump coverage), and my biggest pet peeve - it’s affdavIT not affidavid. For someone who went to law school, that one is pretty bad.

I came to leave a review as I’ve listened for a few weeks now and I’m continuing to listen as I appreciate both sides. Before leaving the review I looked at other reviews and can’t help but laugh. Here this girl is delivering facts and people are leaving low star reviews because they can tell she’s conservative? I was thinking she obviously leans pretty left which just goes to show she’s pretty unbiased. Or that both sides are so delusional that if you aren’t holding their picket signs and pitchforks they must be for the other side. Keep it up girl I am learning a lot and appreciate it all!

I’ve listened to this podcast for a long time. Overall Jordan does a great job and in a world full of biased media she does a good job giving facts. I listen to her podcast for her point of view but I will say I would not take what she is saying as fully “unbiased.” I have noticed she goes into detail on some topics that are uncontroversial while quickly going over other topics that are very controversial. I would like to hear more background on these topics and understand both sides arguments rather than just stating a fact. I’m not sure if she does this on purpose or not but by not giving the full picture it sends inaccurate information. Truly I think Jordan is on the right path and is far better than most major news outlets that are rage bait. So I’m sincerely hoping this is taken as constructive feedback because I want to keep supporting.

Anyone who listens to even one episode will realize either this person doesn’t have a clue what’s going on or they’re pretending to not understand the details. For example in the most recent episode, she discussed the Musk email asking federal workers to list 5 things they did that week and then at the end of the episode, she asked the listeners to think about how we would react if our boss asked us to list what we did that week. The whole point of the outrage about that email is that the workers boss was not the one who asked them what they did that week. It’s pretty evident she is trying to normalize what is going on in this administration. Don’t fall for the UNBIASED line. If you want to know both sides of a story, read news from both sides and see what makes the most sense to you.

This Podcast has helped me see things in a more objective way. First of all, Jordan explains very well the legal details and second, always provides context and history to whatever topic in on the table. It has taught me to see that nothing is black or white and most importantly to think critically. Not to see only how I feel about a specific issue, but what it really is, how can it really affect or help the country and most importantly to think about the opposite side of my own bias. I think I’m starting to accept that I don’t have to be always right or prove it to anyone, but also understand how others can have a point too. Love it!

I appreciate Jordan’s calm, even tone when reporting the news. The straightforward nature of her speech is less overstimulating than other popular news sources. However, I wouldn’t say that this podcast is “unbiased” both because of the headlines that she chooses to present and the incomplete context that she provides within the stories. Not a bad podcast if you’re searching for a less emotionally driven take on conservative leaning news, but I wouldn’t say it is balanced or unbiased reporting.

The most biased “unbiased” show

I’ve been listening to Unbiased Politics for about a year, and it has become my go-to source for staying informed. With news stories breaking so quickly, it’s hard to fact-check everything—but this podcast cuts through the noise, delivering just the facts while separating truth from speculation. Jordan is deeply committed to accuracy and integrity, consistently providing high-quality, well-researched information. I especially respect that she holds herself accountable, making corrections when necessary. Her dedication to clarity and truth makes this podcast an invaluable resource, and I’m incredibly grateful for the work she puts into it.

I finally feel close to an informed citizen. I’ve been basically ignoring news for several years now because I’m so sick of “news.” This podcast is factual, unbiased, and offers tremendous value for the time investment. We must #resist the one sided, fear lingering news agenda (from both sides). Thank you for creating this podcast!!

I appreciate the unbiased deliverance of those facts. I don’t know how Jordan can keep a straight face about some of the facts she has to deliver, but she does an excellent job of doing just that. This podcast keeps me sane especially after being bombarded on social media with so many outrageous pseudo-facts and knee-jerk reaction opinions. Thank you!

I listened to help understand how conservative supporters frame and justify current events by de-emphasizing key impacts. A great example was the USAID discussion, there was little or no emphasis of its percentage of the budget, its effect on the deficit, or the millions of lives it impacts, both foreign and domestic. Or her reference that RFK Jr. did okay or didn’t do that bad in congressional interviews… that’s a bias opinion. Instead, she provides quotes and opinions from both sides, which just re-iterates bias with little real data or analysis. Despite frequently emphasizing her unbiased stance, true neutrality would mean constantly acknowledging her own biases and clarifying whether she leans conservative or liberal. She should team up with an analyst or economist that leans opposite of her (so they challenge each other on the topic) if she wanted to elevated the conversation and focus on the numbers and impacts so people can start forming their own opinions.