Thinking LSAT
Thinking LSAT
Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
Should I Keep Studying LG? (Ep. 426)
54 minutes Posted Oct 30, 2023 at 2:57 pm.
Should I Keep Studying LG?
Personal Statement Topics
Perfect Passages
Eliminating Wrong Answers
Parallel Reasoning
Drilling LR Question Types
Downside to Retaking?
0:00
54:35
Download MP3
Show notes
Logic Games will soon be on their way out, and many LSAT students are now grappling with the decision of whether to study them. Should you invest time in mastering LG, or should you pivot toward preparing for a games-free LSAT? In this week’s discussion, Ben and Nathan advocate a balanced approach that prepares students for any version of the test. Later, the guys provide feedback on personal statement topics, share the key to unlocking perfect RC passages, and weigh the pros and cons of retaking the test.
LSAT Demon
LSAT Demon iOS App
LSAT Demon Daily
Watch Episode 426 on YouTube
Thinking LSAT YouTube
LSAT Demon YouTube
With Logic Games leaving the LSAT in August 2024, listener Amanda is unsure whether to continue practicing LG or to shift her focus solely to Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension. Nathan and Ben propose a flexible study plan that allows Amanda to keep her options open.
Ben and Nathan provide insights on several listeners’ personal statement topics. One applicant intends to explain a career change. Another wants to address their ADHD diagnosis. A third considers highlighting their ethnicity and cultural heritage.
Listener Regan rarely scores perfectly on a logic game or RC passage. Nathan and Ben challenge Regan to pick an answer only when they’re certain it’s correct.
If you’re critical of the answer choices, you can eliminate wrong answers without fully explaining why they’re wrong.
Some Parallel Reasoning questions present answer choices that rearrange the premises and the conclusion. Ben and Nathan demonstrate an intuitive approach to solving these questions.
Students often struggle to distinguish Necessary Assumption questions from Sufficient Assumption questions. Nathan and Ben see value in designating time to drill these and other commonly confused question types.
Nolan worries that law schools might view him unfavorably if he retakes the LSAT and gets a lower score. Ben and Nathan assure Nolan that any potential downside of retaking is negligible, and the potential rewards could be game-changing.