Thinking LSAT
Thinking LSAT
Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
A Fraternity Treasurer's Personal Statement (Ep. 306)
1 hour 27 minutes Posted Jul 12, 2021 at 3:52 pm.
0:00
1:27:19
Download MP3
Show notes

Conclusions that are stated without sufficient evidence invite skepticism. To succeed on the LSAT, you need to be able to spot unwarranted conclusions and poke holes in weak arguments. On your personal statement, you’re the one making the argument. You want to demonstrate to the reader that you’re an ideal candidate for their law school. The best way to prove your case is to present indisputable evidence. State the facts, and allow the reader to draw their own conclusions about how great you are. On this week’s episode, Ben and Nathan review a fraternity treasurer’s personal statement that weighs a bit too heavily on conclusions. They offer constructive criticism that anyone writing a personal statement can learn from. The guys also break down an LSAT Conclusion question from PrepTest 73, and Nathan stumps Ben with a brainteaser. Read more on our website!

Watch Episode 306 on YouTube